Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] HEADS UP - changes to FreeBSD Bacula ports

2012-04-04 03:04:13
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] HEADS UP - changes to FreeBSD Bacula ports
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml AT netfence DOT it>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:44:13 +0200
On 04/03/12 20:55, Dan Langille wrote:

> Better solution: create a third port which installs JUST the shared
> libraries.  That solution isn't in scope at present.

I agree this would be the best solution.
However bacula-server depending on bacula-client is fine for me; IMHO 
the disadvantages will almost go unnoticed.

  bye & Thanks
        av.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users