On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:25 AM, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> 
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Rushdhi Mohamed <zmrushdhi AT gmail DOT com> 
> wrote:
>> thanks john..
>>
>> but..
>> Sorry i made a mistake in my problem... im not going to use tapes any
>> more... to store backups. i brought a new NAS with 7TB..
>>
>> so only the copy jobs will be stored in the tapes..
>>
>> my question is can Bacula handle up to 400GB of data (it may grow up till
>> 500GB within a year) in a single volume on a file storage device.. if it is
>> possible i am going to store all the backups for a day in a single volume.
>>
>> if not i can break it and store.. in this case i am going to store the
>> backups for a day in to 3 volumes. each around 150GB
>>
>> can you pls tel me what is efficient.. sorry if my English is not clear
>>
>
> For file based volumes I recommend much smaller volumes. However
> bacula will handle 400GB disk volumes.
>
> John



-- 
John M. Drescher

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users