On Dec 13, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Marcio Merlone wrote:
> Em 12-12-2011 18:41, Ben Walton escreveu:
>>
>> I don't see a documented item about running a 5.2.1 client with the
>> older 5.0.3 director and 5.0.3 storage daemon. (I do see notes about
>> doing this version straddle in the opposite direction.) It seems to
>> work but is it a valid configuration? Is there anything I should know
>> when running like this?
>
> +1
>
> I was about to try that. Windows version of bat 5.0.x is broken for me, so I
> wanted to try the new version, but had no guts for this... :)
The general rule for version:
bacula-dir = bacula-sd (always, always, always, do not violate this rule)
bacula-fd <= bacula-dir
Thus, you can let the FD lag behind the servers. You can upgrade the servers
and not worry about upgrading the clients.
However, if you use a newer client, results may be interesting. Try it. See
if it works. No promises.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
