Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Very low performance with compression and encryption !

2011-01-20 11:04:13
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Very low performance with compression and encryption !
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: Sean Clark <smclark AT tamu DOT edu>, bacula-users <Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:01:19 -0500
>> This is normal. If you want fast compression do not use software
>> compression and use a tape drive with HW compression like LTO drives.
>>
>> John
> Not really an option for file/disk devices though.
>
> I've been tempted to experiment with BTRFS using LZO or standard zlib
> compression for storing the volumes and see how the performance compares
> to having bacula-fd do the compression before sending - I have a
> suspicion the former might be better..
>

Doing the compression at the filesystem level is an idea I have wanted
to try for several years. Hopefully one of the filesystems that
support this becomes stable soon.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand 
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you 
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users