Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Choice of DB for catalog

2011-01-17 16:32:00
Subject: [Bacula-users] Choice of DB for catalog
From: Devin Reade <gdr AT gno DOT org>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:27:20 -0700
--On Monday, January 17, 2011 10:50:39 AM -0500 Dan Langille
<dan AT langille DOT org> wrote:

(In another thread)

> Even though you are doing migrate, this might help, because Migrate and 
> Copy are so similar.
> 
>    http://www.freebsddiary.org/bacula-disk-to-tape.php

I started to scan that document, and I saw this snippet:

    At present, the Catalog can be SQLite (not recommended),
    MySQL (also, not recommended, but if you have to use it,
    it's better than SQLite), [...]

Eh?  Have I missed some important point about using MySQL for Bacula's
catalog, or is this just the author's prejudices speaking?  Sure, 
<http://www.bacula.org/manuals/en/catalog/catalog/Catalog_Maintenance.html>
describes things about which one should be aware, but I don't recall
having seen anywhere a recommendation of Postgres over MySQL (or vice
versa) or a statement about significant benefits of one vs the other.

Devin


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand 
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you 
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>