On 01/06/11 12:36, Sean Clark wrote:
> I think if you give the virtual full a lower priority than the
> incremental, you can schedule both for the same day and have it always
> do the incremental then the virtual full in the correct order (haven't
> actually TRIED to do this myself, so I'm guessing).

The problem with this is that *none* of the VirtualFulls will run until
*no* higher-priority job is running.  Which means that a single
long-running job, say a Full backup of a large server, could cause all
of your VirtualFulls to be delayed until it finishes.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
         Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users