Re: [Bacula-users] Tuning for large (millions of files) backups?
2010-11-08 07:44:24
Ondrej PLANKA (Ignum profile) wrote:
> We have several 10+ million file jobs - all run without problem (backup
> and restore).
>
> I am aware of the fact that a lot of Bacula users run PG ( Bacula
> Systems also does recommend PG for larger setups ) but nevertheless
> MySQL has served us very well so far.
Mysql works well - if tuned, but tuning is a major undertaking when
things get large/busy and may take several iterations.
The main advantage I've found to Postgress is that when you have a very
large database (100+ million entries) it has a far smaller memory/CPU
footprint (Half the memory and about 1/4 the cpu load).
It's also largely self-tuning - which lets me get on with the business
of running backups instead of monitoring database performance...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a
Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your
business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|