Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason
2010-09-14 04:01:34
Am 14.09.2010 09:53, schrieb Silver Salonen:
> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:41:38 Christian Manal wrote:
>> Am 14.09.2010 09:30, schrieb Silver Salonen:
>>> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:13:49 Christian Manal wrote:
>>>> Am 14.09.2010 08:36, schrieb Silver Salonen:
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> I use Bacula 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 8.0. I have a huge archive-type backup that
>>>>> has no full backup in its schedule:
>>>>>
>>>>> Schedule {
>>>>> Name = Archive
>>>>> Run = Level=Differential 1st fri at 23:05
>>>>> Run = Level=Incremental 2nd-5th fri at 23:05
>>>>> Run = Level=Incremental sat-thu at 23:05
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> The job builds its fileset dynamically with "/usr/bin/find
>>>>> /path/to/backup -type f -mtime +90d -print" - it takes a while, but does
>>>>> its job. From time-to-time the job just gets upgraded to full.. like
>>>>> today:
>>>>>
>>>>> 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135: 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135:
>>>>> No prior or suitable Full backup found in catalog. Doing FULL backup.
>>>>> 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135: Start Backup JobId 9135,
>>>>> Job=userdata-archive.2010-09-13_23.05.01_05
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas why this happens?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a way to continue with incremental backups once such a full
>>>>> backup has been cancelled (eg. modifying Bacula DB manually)? It would
>>>>> really hurt to start from scratch with this archive.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> did you set "Ignore FileSet Changes = yes" in your FileSet's
>>>> "Options"-Section? If not, the job level will be elevated to full, if
>>>> the FileSet changes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian Manal
>>>
>>> Yes I did. Otherwise the job would be upgraded to full every time :)
>>>
>>
>> Well, it could have been, that the dynamically generated FileSet only
>> changes now and then.
>
> The dataset is big enough to contain at least a modified file for every day :)
>
>>> This upgrade happened now after 35 days, ie the full backup was done 35
>>> days ago, on 10th of August. Meanwhile only incrementals/differentials were
>>> done.
>>>
>>
>> What about your retention periods? Maybe the job or volume of the last
>> full backup got pruned.
>
> Retention period of the full volume is 10 years. The client's file and job
> retention periods are 6 months. So I don't think configuration of any of
> these parameters' could have caused that.
>
> --
> Silver
>
Then I'm out of ideas. Sorry.
Regards,
Christian Manal
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Christian Manal
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Christian Manal
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason,
Christian Manal <=
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Martin Simmons
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Martin Simmons
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Bruno Friedmann
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Martin Simmons
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
|
|
|