>>>>> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:48:02 +0000, Robin Hill said:
> 
> I'm trying to build bacula on one of my systems and need both file and
> storage daemons, but not the director (as that's running on another
> system).  This worked fine with 3.0.3 but fails under 5.0.1 as it
> insists on a database being specified (though neither the storage nor
> file daemons seem to be linked against any database libraries).
> 
> Is the database code actually used by the storage daemon (or can I just
> use sqlite and avoid the need to compile the database on that system)?

The storage daemon itself doesn't link with the database, so using sqlite is
fine (it must be sqlite3 in fact).  This will also build the bscan program
with sqlite, so if you need to run that then you will need the correct
database library.


> If not, is it expected behaviour for the configure script to require a
> database to be specified (I tried commenting that out but the build
> still failed as it tried to compile the database code)?

Yes, because bscan is part of the storage daemon.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users