Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Getting auto-label feature to work properly

2010-03-23 04:53:45
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Getting auto-label feature to work properly
From: "Dominique Jeannerod" <dominique.jeannerod AT interact-iv DOT com>
To: <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:26:19 +0100

Volumes are being recycled, and re-used, and this function is working as expected.

What I want Bacula to do is create automatically new volumes when needed, and this works, … but not always, as I’m sometimes getting this :

 

05-Mar 22:30 fr-201-sd JobId 747: Job JD_sv-ics-bck-web-304.2010-03-05_22.30.00_06 waiting. Cannot find any appendable volumes.

Please use the "label"  command to create a new Volume for:

    Storage:      "fr-201-sd-4" (/backups)

    Pool:         PD_Default

    Media type:   File

05-Mar 23:30 sv-ics-tst-bkp-fr-201-dir JobId 747: There are no more Jobs associated with Volume "DAT-SD-FR-2-11". Marking it purged.

05-Mar 23:30 sv-ics-tst-bkp-fr-201-dir JobId 747: All records pruned from Volume "DAT-SD-FR-2-11"; marking it "Purged"

05-Mar 23:30 sv-ics-tst-bkp-fr-201-dir JobId 747: Recycled volume "DAT-SD-FR-2-11"

05-Mar 23:30 fr-201-sd JobId 747: Recycled volume "DAT-SD-FR-2-11" on device "fr-201-sd-4" (/backups), all previous data lost.

05-Mar 23:30 sv-ics-tst-bkp-fr-201-dir JobId 747: Volume used once. Marking Volume "DAT-SD-FR-2-11" as Used.

 

What is strange, is that the jobs automatically continues after wainting one hour (my wait timeout), and recycles a volume.

But I’m wasting one hour of our backup window.

I don’t understand what could be wrong in my configuration.

 

Dominique

 

 

De : Norberto Meijome [mailto:numardbsd AT gmail DOT com]
Envoyé : mardi 23 mars 2010 03:05
À : Dominique Jeannerod
Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Getting auto-label feature to work properly

 

2010/3/23 Dominique Jeannerod <dominique.jeannerod AT interact-iv DOT com>

Hello,

 

I’m currently working on Bacula 5.0.1 to upgrade our current production backup system.

We are backuping on disk files, and thus implement the auto-label feature, using counters.

On our first tests, everything was running as planned : volumes were created and labeled automatically, and then recycled.

What happens now is that old volumes are recycled as they should be, but new volumes are not created when needed, and I’m getting the famous message :


I am possibly wrong, but shouldn't you want recycled volumes to be re-used?
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome

"The only people that never change are the stupid and the dead"
 Jorge Luis Borges.

I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>