Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 3.0.3 failing to find plugins

>>>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:50:30 -0500, Phil Stracchino said:
> 
> Every time I start up Bacula, it tells me that it cannot find any
> plugins in /opt/bacula/lib.  Yet:
> 
> babylon4:root:~:1 # ls -l /opt/bacula/lib
> total 1666
> -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 root root  20737 Mar 12 11:25 bpipe-fd.so*
> -rwxr-xr--+ 1 root root    933 Mar 12 11:25 libbac.la*
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     15 Mar 12 11:25 libbac.so -> libbac.so.1.0.0*
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     15 Mar 12 11:25 libbac.so.1 -> libbac.so.1.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 root root 847800 Mar 12 11:25 libbac.so.1.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr--+ 1 root root    951 Mar 12 11:25 libbaccfg.la*
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     18 Mar 12 11:25 libbaccfg.so ->
> libbaccfg.so.1.0.0*
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     18 Mar 12 11:25 libbaccfg.so.1 ->
> libbaccfg.so.1.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 root root  67224 Mar 12 11:25 libbaccfg.so.1.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr--+ 1 root root    957 Mar 12 11:25 libbacfind.la*
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     19 Mar 12 11:25 libbacfind.so ->
> libbacfind.so.1.0.0*
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     19 Mar 12 11:25 libbacfind.so.1 ->
> libbacfind.so.1.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 root root 198642 Mar 12 11:25 libbacfind.so.1.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr--+ 1 root root    945 Mar 12 11:25 libbacpy.la*
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     17 Mar 12 11:25 libbacpy.so ->
> libbacpy.so.1.0.0*
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     17 Mar 12 11:25 libbacpy.so.1 ->
> libbacpy.so.1.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 root root  21673 Mar 12 11:25 libbacpy.so.1.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr--+ 1 root root   1071 Mar 12 11:25 libbacsql.la*
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     18 Mar 12 11:25 libbacsql.so ->
> libbacsql.so.1.0.0*
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     18 Mar 12 11:25 libbacsql.so.1 ->
> libbacsql.so.1.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 root root 337719 Mar 12 11:25 libbacsql.so.1.0.0*
> 
> 
> Well, maybe Bacula can't, but *I* can see the bpipe plugin sitting in there.
> 
> The host is an AMD64 box running Solaris 10 x86.  Has anyone else run
> into this?  Is it trying to tell me that there aren't any plugins for
> the *director* in there, only for the FD?

That is difficult to know without seeing the message :-)

Maybe you can start the daemons separately to see which one is reporting it?

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users