Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected
2010-01-05 17:11:38
Brian Debelius wrote:
> That would be 16M. Isn't the SD hard limited to 1M?
>
"The maximun size-in-bytes possible is 2,000,000"
From the SD Configuration Maximum block size directive.
Regards,
Richard
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Tino Schwarze
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Brian Debelius
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Tino Schwarze
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Ralf Gross
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Thomas Mueller
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Ralf Gross
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Thomas Mueller
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Ralf Gross
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Jesper Krogh
- Re: [Bacula-users] LTO3 tape capacity lower than expected, Brian Debelius
- [Bacula-users] bacula 3.0.3 maintain ctime on restored files?, Steve Costaras
|
|
|