I have several mixed clients all backing up to Linux and Solaris
SD's. The windows fileserver's are taking far too long, so in looking
at this, I noticed the cpu utilization on the Windows FD's isn't very
high but the SD are, why is that? Searching the forum showed compression
is done at the FD level.

I first changed the network buffer with zero impact.

I then made several backups turning off GZIP and SHA1 options in the fileset
for ~27gig of data.

GZIP and SHA1, speed averaged ~7800KB/s.
No GZIP or SHA1, speed went up to ~30000KB/s

Looking more closely at the FD, it appears to be single threaded and not
really utilize the cpu very aggressively either.

Is there anything that can be done here to help?

Thanks!
jlc


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users