Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 1.38 file daemon compatibility with latest 3.0 Bacula Server Solution

2009-08-13 10:15:19
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 1.38 file daemon compatibility with latest 3.0 Bacula Server Solution
From: Marek Simon <marek.simon AT trustica DOT cz>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:10:16 +0200
I used combination 1.38 FD and 2.4.4 director + SD, and it works, except 
if I use the Runscript directive - the Filedaemon did not know it.
I have no experience with bacula 3.0 director
Marek

Michael Halfhill napsal(a):
> Has anyone confirmed if there are any complications or issues with  
> remote bacula 1.38 file daemon clients working
> 
> with Bacula 3.0 Server solution?
> 
> 
> Michael G. Halfhill
> East Kentucky Network, LLC.
> Appalachian Wireless
> Information Technology
> mhalfhill AT ekn DOT com
> (606) 477-2355 ext 144
> (606) 791-9421 cell
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>