On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Graham Keeling <graham AT equiinet DOT com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 09:34:30PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>> tonight i ran my very first concurrent backup and the backup time went
>> down nicely. yay.
>>
>> when trying to restore something from the backup i got this:
> ...
>> Files Expected: 1
>> Files Restored: 0
>
> Hello,
>
> I found a very serious bacula bug a few months ago that has only been fixed
> properly recently (I believe that 2.4.0 would have been affected), to do with
> overlapping jobs both trying to use a single volume at the same time.
>
> Did you have two jobs write to a single volume at the same time?
yes, most likely that happend. i do have less volumes after the
concurrent backup compared to the sequential. but there was a way to
work around that, wasnt there?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
