|
Re: [Bacula-users] question on full backups
2009-03-30 18:30:56
I did change the fileset to add an exclude in between. Would that cause all the previously backed-up files to be backed up again? If so, I suppose I should just delete the original job, and re-run the full backup. Seems silly, though, to have it run a full backup just because an exclusion was added.
Would it be possible to pull the excluded file from the first backup, and then get an incremental? Just curious...
On Mar 30, 2009 5:09pm, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> 2009/3/30 Justin Williams rjustinwilliams AT gmail DOT com>:
>
> > I am currently testing an incremental backup, and have it disabled. I ran
>
> > the backup and got a full backup, as expected, having not run it before.
>
> > I then ran it again, and got that no full or suitable backup was found, and
>
> > that another full backup would be run.
>
> >
>
> > Is this caused by the backup being presently disabled? Or is there some
>
> > other cause to this?
>
>
>
> Did you change with the fileset or job definition between backups?
>
>
>
> John
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|
