Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Delete volume on purge

2009-02-16 09:30:42
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Delete volume on purge
From: Thiago Simoes <tsimoes AT lightcomm.com DOT br>
To: Alex F <alexxzell AT yahoo DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:31:52 -0300
Alex F wrote:
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 2/16/09, Kern Sibbald* wrote:
>
>     On Monday 16 February 2009 14:08:59 Dan Langille wrote:
>     > Alex F wrote:
>     > > Item 1. Delete volume on purge.
>     > > Origin: Alex F, alexxzell at yahoo dot com
>     > > Date: 16 February 2009
>     > >
>     > > What: A feature that would permit Bacula to delete a volume
>     from the
>     > > hard disk after it has been purged.
>     > >
>     > > Why: Useful for users backing up to hard disks. I for
>     instance, am doing
>     > > this, and have to manually list volumes, seek and delete them, and
>     > > afterwards delete them from the mysql database. Woulld be
>     acceptable if
>     > > I had to do it for 1 client...but I have many servers being
>     backed up so
>     > > this is time-consuming. Maybe a new status could be defined
>     when listing
>     > > jobs, something like "Deleted".
>     > >    I know Bacula treats backups like if it were tape jobs, but
>     I believe
>     > > that this approach is a little outdated, and some help should
>     be pointed
>     > > towards the users who use Servers for the purpose of backing up.
>     >
>     > This is what recycling is for.
>
>     >I would second both Eric's remark and Dan's remark.  If you
>     recycle Volumes,
>     >in general, there is no need for deleting them.  I suspect you
>     haven't read
>     >the manual carefully as there is a whole chapter devoted to this
>     -- there is
>     >no need to manually do anything in 99.9% of all cases.
>
>     I surely agree with you, Kern, about the whole Recycling thing. I
>     have also read the manual many times before and I am aware of the
>     Recycling chapter.
>     Why I have chosen not to recycle my volumes is because I label
>     them by <JobId, date, time> etc (LabelFormat =
>     
> "JobID-${JobId}_Client-${Client}_${Day:p/2/0/r}-${Month:p/2/0/r}-${Year}_${Hour:p/2/0/r}h:${Minute:p/2/0/r}m:${Second:p/2/0/r}s"),
>     and when recycled, it just keeps the old name, it doesn't actually
>     relabel the volume.
>     That is why I chose to have multiple volumes all labeled nicely.
>     It's better for me to have them arranged like that.
>
>     >In some very special applications where the names of the volumes
>     are critical
>     >and must be changed rather than using recycling, or when volumes
>     are purged a
>     >long time before they are re-used (recycled), I can see the need
>     for deleting
>     >volumes, but as Eric points out, that feature has already been
>     requested.
>     >Regards,
>     >Kern
>
>     You got that right all the way! I hope you see my point now (I
>     read your last paragraph after I already explained my reasons).
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>   
I labeled my volumes based on the name of the servers. Since I got 
several servers I thought this way I can keep track of each backup and 
is easy to restore using a single and short volume.
As Kern said, in a particulary case delete volumes is needed.

Regards,

Thiago Simões

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>