Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE

2009-02-04 12:17:07
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Solaris 10 or SXCE
From: Brian Debelius <bdebelius AT intelesyscorp DOT com>
To: Ryan Novosielski <novosirj AT umdnj DOT edu>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:52:12 -0500
Are you speaking of Solaris binaries or Linux binaries?  I have not seen 
any Solaris packages.  I saw Bacula v2.2.8 on Blastwave a few minutes ago.


Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Do you have some reason you need to compile it as opposed to using
> binary packages that are provided? I switched from the former to the
> latter (albeit on Solaris 9 for my director/storage daemon), but because
> it was easier, not because it didn't work (it worked fine).
>
> Brian Debelius wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have watched a few threads go by about compiling Bacula on Solaris, 
>> and I have not come to the conclusion as to whether anyone has gotten it 
>> to run and be stable. So..
>> Does Bacula compile? Does Bacula run reliably once compiled?
>>     


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>