Re: [Bacula-users] Volume Relabelling
2009-01-19 12:45:56
OK, not "recycled" but "reused after recycling"; sorry, I didn't express
myself correctly.
And, of course, it should be optional; I meant mostly *-to-disk scenarios.
Any idea how this can be managed "by bconsole scripting" as someone had
suggested?
Alex
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
>
>>> Can a (disk) volume be automatically relabelled when it is recycled?
>>>
>>>
>> I don't think that's supported atm..
>>
>> I'd like to have that feature too. It shouldn't be too hard to implement..
>>
>
> A recycled volume is still only a candidate for being written on. Volumes
> are labelled when they're moved from recycle to append.
>
> The decision to not relabel tapes until the last possible moment is
> deliberate.
>
> This gives a last-possible-moment for recovering data off a tape which
> have been wiped from the database, using the various bacula command line
> utilities.
>
> It also reduces excessive tape handling. Bear in mind that media like LTO
> has a chip onboard and counts each load/unload cycle towards the end of
> the tape's lifetime (162 cycles(*)) even if only the very beginning of the
> tape has been read/written.
>
> (Yes, this means the "lifetime warranty" on LTO media has different
> real-world durations depending on the purposes the tapes are put to.
> Other media has similar limitations)
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|