Hi

Bacula 2.4.x and SVN Version < 2.5.26 have performance problems
for migration and copy jobs (in 2.5.x)

Especially when u run concurrent disk backup without spooling.
I you have a second disk or raid array, use it for spooling
on your disk backup jobs.   This results in more continuous
date in disk volumes.   Migration rates will be better, but
not optimal.

This issue/bug is reported in http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1190
and most likely fixed in 2.5.26

Ulrich

On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 14:17 -0500, J-P wrote:
> Yes, the database is on the same drive which is a RAID0.
> 
> 
> On 12/22/08 2:11 PM, "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:57 PM, J-P <jphml AT videotron DOT ca> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> Well, sorry I forgot to mention that somewhat important information, those
> >> are migration from local disk to tape. Backups over the network are done at
> >> around 7 - 10 MB/s rate.
> >> 
> > I am definitely not a migration expert (never done any migration) but
> > my guess is this is a database performance problem. Is the db on the
> > same drive as the storage you are migrating from? Is the storage on a
> > raid?
> > 
> > John
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users