Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] aximum size for LTO4

2008-10-13 09:56:03
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] aximum size for LTO4
From: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
To: Richerland Medeiros <rick.land AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:52:46 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Richerland Medeiros wrote:

> How do I use the default compression hardware native of LTO4?
> I have 1.4 TB of data and the tape is full when it comes to 900GB.

You are using the default compression already, else it would be full at
~795Gb

Compression only works on compressable data. Whatever you are putting on
the tape has already been compressed.

2:1 compression claims are very optimistic and must be dismissed as
marketing puffery.

Most of us find that the real average is 1.2:1 on a full backup and higher
on incrementals (logfiles are _very_ compressable)

The only safe way to estimate how many tapes are needed for any given
backup is to use the native capacity of the tape. Compression is a bonus
which means you may use fewer, but don't count on it.

AB


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>