Humm, didn't you have in your fileset the folder where you make your
backup :)
So can you make a listing of your second backup to be sure that in files
there isn't your first backup.
Hemant Shah a écrit :
> Folks,
>
> I ran my first production backup of bacula last weekend. I did a full
> backup to tape, then full backup to disk. Next was incremental backup. Bacula
> said that it was doing incremental backup but it actually did a full backup.
> I am running bacula 2.4.0. Here are the e-mails I received.
>
> Fullbackup:
>
> Build OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu redhat
> JobId: 39
> Job: lidp11-BackupToDisk.2008-07-04_21.04.42
> Backup Level: Full
> Client: "lidp11-fd" 2.4.0 (04Jun08)
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,redhat,
> FileSet: "lidp11 Disk set" 2008-07-04 21:04:05
> Pool: "lidp11-FullBackupDiskPool" (From Job FullPool
> override)
> Storage: "lidp11-File" (From Pool resource)
> Scheduled time: 04-Jul-2008 21:04:01
> Start time: 05-Jul-2008 18:14:14
> End time: 06-Jul-2008 05:01:39
> Elapsed time: 10 hours 47 mins 25 secs
> Priority: 10
> FD Files Written: 2,417,797
> SD Files Written: 2,417,797
> FD Bytes Written: 60,253,728,260 (60.25 GB)
> SD Bytes Written: 60,550,530,761 (60.55 GB)
> Rate: 1551.1 KB/s
> Software Compression: 52.7 %
> VSS: no
> Storage Encryption: no
> Volume name(s): Full-lidp11-2008-07-05-18:14:13
> Volume Session Id: 39
> Volume Session Time: 1215182293
> Last Volume Bytes: 60,661,172,712 (60.66 GB)
> Non-fatal FD errors: 0
> SD Errors: 0
> FD termination status: OK
> SD termination status: OK
> Termination: Backup OK
>
>
> Incremental Backup:
>
> Build OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu redhat
> JobId: 70
> Job: lidp11-BackupToDisk.2008-07-06_22.00.30
> Backup Level: Incremental, since=2008-07-05 18:14:14
> Client: "lidp11-fd" 2.4.0 (04Jun08)
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,redhat,
> FileSet: "lidp11 Disk set" 2008-07-04 21:04:05
> Pool: "lidp11-IncrBackupDiskPool" (From Job IncPool
> override)
> Storage: "lidp11-File" (From Pool resource)
> Scheduled time: 06-Jul-2008 22:00:00
> Start time: 06-Jul-2008 22:05:25
> End time: 07-Jul-2008 06:26:42
> Elapsed time: 8 hours 21 mins 17 secs
> Priority: 10
> FD Files Written: 2,096,136
> SD Files Written: 2,096,136
> FD Bytes Written: 58,910,683,776 (58.91 GB)
> SD Bytes Written: 59,167,747,657 (59.16 GB)
> Rate: 1958.7 KB/s
> Software Compression: 52.4 %
> VSS: no
> Storage Encryption: no
> Volume name(s): Incr-lidp11-2008-07-06-22:05:25
> Volume Session Id: 68
> Volume Session Time: 1215182293
> Last Volume Bytes: 59,271,542,084 (59.27 GB)
> Non-fatal FD errors: 0
> SD Errors: 0
> FD termination status: OK
> SD termination status: OK
> Termination: Backup OK
>
>
> As you can see the amount of data backups is almost the same (60GB).
> This was done over a long weekend, so very few files changed on this
> filesystem.
>
> Hemant Shah
> E-mail: hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
