Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync remote to local dir first, backup local, restore to remote?
2014-09-11 15:19:30
Dne 11.9.2014 16:33, Les Mikesell napsal(a):
>> When backing-up our remote servers, we always get broken pipe. Simply
>> the receiving end (backuppc extracting tar) stalls for too long and the
>> sending part breaks the connection. OK, I understand.
>
> That's not something that should be expected. Do you have nat routers
> or stateful firewalls in the path? Those can have idle timeouts that
> may be exceeded when rsync compares a large unchanged section.
Yes, the link goes through linux nat server. The ssh command did have
the ServerAliveInterval option.
Regards,
Pavel.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync remote to local dir first, backup local, restore to remote?, Les Mikesell |
Next by Date: |
Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync remote to local dir first, backup local, restore to remote?, Pavel Hofman |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync remote to local dir first, backup local, restore to remote?, Les Mikesell |
Next by Thread: |
[BackupPC-users] first copy on slow line, Evaristo Calatravita |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|