BackupPC-users

[BackupPC-users] Rsynv vs. tar, full vs. incremental

2011-05-31 09:27:04
Subject: [BackupPC-users] Rsynv vs. tar, full vs. incremental
From: Pavel Hofman <pavel.hofman AT ivitera DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:24:56 +0200
Hi,

Incremental backup of a linux machine using tar (i.e. only files newer
than...) is several times faster than using rsync. On the other hand,
full backup using tar transfers huge amount of data over network, way
more than the efficient rsync.

Is there a way to use rsync for full backup and tar for the incremental
runs? I do not even know whether the two transfer modes formats produce
mutually compatible data in the pool.

Thanks a lot for any hints.

Pavel.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. 
Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>