BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC configuration question

2011-03-09 13:34:33
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC configuration question
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
To: backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:32:41 -0600
On 3/9/2011 12:01 PM, Jim Durand wrote:
> What is beneficial about doing full backups weekly versus making only 1
> full backup then incremental going forward?

First, if you use rsync, full backups just compare data and send 
differences - and rebuild the tree for the next comparisons.

With tar and smb as the xfer methods, incrementals go by the timestamp 
only and won't catch deletions or old files in their new location under 
renamed directories so your backup drifts out of sync.  With rsync, the 
comparison is done against the previous full and the changes become 
larger and larger on each run unless you do incremental levels.  If you 
do incremental levels, the server side work of merging the trees for the 
comparison base grows as you add levels.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>