[BackupPC-users] Avoiding pitfalls of tar
2011-02-23 09:54:23
Hi folks,
Over at
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/limitations.html#incremental_backups_might_not_be_accurate
there is documented a limitation of BackupPC incrementals with tar:
since it uses timestamps only, it may miss if someone does something
like unpack a ZIP file that contains files with timestamps in the past.
It also won't note if files were deleted.
However, this is not necessarily an insoluble problem with GNU tar. GNU
tar has a "listed incremental" mode which works around this problem.
See the documentation at [1].
I am thinking it may be possible to do this with some simple shell
scripting (writing out a snapshot file based on the backup number, and
for incrementals copying the snapshot file from the backup the
incremental is based on over to one for the current run) without
modification to BackupPC itself. However, I'm unsure whether BackupPC's
custom tar parsing would work well with the result.
It would certainly be better to see this code integrated into BackupPC
directly.
Thoughts?
[1]
http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_node/Incremental-Dumps.html#SEC94
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [BackupPC-users] Avoiding pitfalls of tar,
John Goerzen <=
|
|
|