On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:34:19PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> OK I was confused for a second there since usually the convention
> is to use '---' as the original code and '+++' as the new code...

Sorry, musta put the diff in the wrong order.

> Well actually, I had found and fixed that bug a *long* time ago
> (Dec 2009) or earlier but the new version was not updated on the
> Wiki.

Yeah, about that: is it really that hard to get wiki access?  I've
made a lot of updates to various scripts, and I've seen many scripts
posted that never get updated on the wiki.

Do you have access?  Seems like you should.

Can I get access?

> Actually, my correction is IMO simpler and less kludgey. 

Agreed.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly 
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus 
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/