Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:

> I would be *very* interested in hearing your (informal) roadmap of
> where you would like to take BackupPC (and where you wouldn't).
>
> As I have mentioned before, there is an almost endless amount of
> extensions that could be added ranging from very modest tweaks to
> whole new directions that would fundamentally transform BackupPC. It
> would be good to hear your views and to have an active discussion
> among users about what is the right balance of extensions and new
> functionality.

Maybe the mailinglist for development discussions might be of interest  
to you? See https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-devel

> Well, I think you have answered your own question in part. FUSE is and
> has been standard on current kernels for probably 2 years now. So, any
> recent distro will certainly have it included and I imagine by the
> time 4.x is released that even "older" distros like CentOS and RHEL
> will have it ;)

Enterprise distributions are usually not too keen on adding new  
functionality to a release. I'm not sure if for instance Red Hat is  
planning on adding FUSE support to RHEL 4.

Nils Breunese.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/