Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency
2009-08-14 13:54:37
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Brian Cuttler<brian AT wadsworth DOT org>
wrote:
> They look like the same binary but don't act like the same binary.
This is really best handled by those who are skilled in the ways of
Solaris -- the operating system has lots of weird behaviors with
regard to linking. What's happening is that amandad is recording a
link to 'libamanda', which ldd is then resolving to the first
libamanda it finds, which happens to be the really old one on cascade.
Two possible solutions:
- delete the old libraries
- make sure the linker does not look in the directory containing the
old libraries (/opt/sfw/lib) by removing it from various LD_foo_PATH
variables (some of which are specified at compile time, IIRC).
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86, Brian Cuttler
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86, Dustin J. Mitchell
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86, Brian Cuttler
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86, Dustin J. Mitchell
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86, Brian Cuttler
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86, Dustin J. Mitchell
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86, Brian Cuttler
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86, Brian Cuttler
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency, Brian Cuttler
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency, Brian Cuttler
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency,
Dustin J. Mitchell <=
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency, Chris Hoogendyk
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency, Brian Cuttler
- Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency, Chris Hoogendyk
|
|
|