[Amanda-users] How to read and interpret completed job emails from Amanda
2008-10-29 13:28:26
Hi,
I was hoping I could get a little help in reading the output of Amanda (2.6)
when I get the completion emails from it. Its a new install and I find it
confusing on why it makes some statements in the information email after it
completes the backup.
Here is the information from the email and what I assume it is refering to,
please correct me if I am making the wrong assumptions on what this is telling
me.
STATISTICS:
Total Full Incr.
-------- -------- --------
Estimate Time (hrs:min) 0:08
Run Time (hrs:min) 12:47
Dump Time (hrs:min) 9:04 9:04 0:00
Output Size (meg) 1446225.1 1446225.1 0.0
Original Size (meg) 1446225.1 1446225.1 0.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
Filesystems Dumped 2 2 0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s) 45348.8 45348.8 --
All pretty straight forward above; total run time almost 13hours, capacity
backed up 1.44TB, no compression. 2 FS's in my DLE, and the Dump rate was
45MB/s .
Tape Time (hrs:min) 7:07 7:07 0:00
Tape Size (meg) 1446225.1 1446225.1 0.0
Tape Used (%) 359.4 359.4 0.0
Filesystems Taped 2 2 0
Chunks Taped 40 40 0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 57752.5 57752.5 --
Here is where it gets fuzzy... and not in logic. Tape size... the amount that
was put to tape? Tape Used... 359%? Avg Tp Write Rate, the holding disk wrote
to the tape drive @ 57MB/s....correct?
USAGE BY TAPE:
Label Time Size % Nb Nc
AmaTor-002 2:29 470300448K 114.1 0 12
AmaTor-003 2:27 494028950K 119.9 1 13
AmaTor-004 2:00 464873216K 112.8 0 12
AmaTor-005 0:20 86912230K 21.1 1 3
How did my Tapes load more then their capacity of 360GB each (LTO3 @ 400GB
native capacity - 40GB tape split size).
NOTES:
planner: Adding new disk
archive2.win.mrxfx.com:/array/sata-1/maxpayne/SHOTS/148Ax050.
planner: Adding new disk
archive2.win.mrxfx.com:/array/sata-1/maxpayne/SHOTS/033x010.
taper: Will request retry of failed split part.
taper: Will request retry of failed split part.
taper: Will request retry of failed split part.
I cant tell if this is an error or just for my information, I assume it caused
by the Tape Split Size value we use.
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATS TAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s
-------------------------- ------------------------------------- -------------
archive2.win -TS/033x010 0 722933590 722933590 -- 198:16 60769.8 241:30
49893.5
archive2.win -S/148Ax050 0 758000870 758000870 -- 346:00 36512.1 185:53
67962.4
And finally this final output which tells me that bandwidth was different for
the 2 FS's , why would one throughput be higher then the other one.
Thanks for the decryption services :) .
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by glenchandler AT gmail DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Amanda-users] How to read and interpret completed job emails from Amanda,
g00f <=
|
|
|