Amanda-Users

Re: LTO-4 tapetype and blocksize

2008-10-21 14:18:05
Subject: Re: LTO-4 tapetype and blocksize
From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>
To: Jean-Francois Malouin <Jean-Francois.Malouin AT bic.mni.mcgill DOT ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:13:52 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 at 12:22pm, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote

Just got a new HP LTO-4 tape drive and I've done some testing
to get a tapetype entry for it and I don't see much of a difference
between the default (32k) and higher values like 512k, 1024k and
2048k (see below). What are your experiences wrt to a specific choice
of a blocksize for such a drive?

I tested an LTO-3 drive using tar back in the day, and the speed increased from 41MB/s at 32KB blocks to 60MB/s using 2MB blocks.

Also: I have LTO-3 tapes written with a blocksize of 32k:
will I be able to extract data from them using a different blocksize?

From 'man amrestore':
OPTIONS
       -b     Set  the  blocksize  used to read the tape or holding file. All
              holding files must be read with a blocksize of 32 KBytes. Amre-
              store  should  normally  be able to determine the blocksize for
              tapes on its own and not need this parameter.

--
Joshua Baker-LePain
QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin
UCSF

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>