Amanda-Users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1

2008-07-26 17:44:52
Subject: Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1
From: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
To: "Doyle Collings" <dcollings AT loganutah DOT org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:37:16 -0400 
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Doyle Collings
<dcollings AT loganutah DOT org> wrote:
> When you say thay your getting rid of --with-maxtapeblocksize in 
> Amanda-2.6.1, does that mean I will be able to specify blocksize in my 
> tapetype definition without it?  Is is neccesary now or does it just specify 
> the maximum blocksize I can use?  Is there a source RPM for 64bit SLES?

a) yes
b) yes, it currently just specifies the maximum size (well, it's kinda
complicated, but)
c) Source RPMs are architecture-agnostic.  To my knowledge, our RPMs
will build on SLES10 - x86_64.  If you have trouble, post to the list.

Dustin

-- 
Storage Software Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1, Doyle Collings
Next by Date:  Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1, Doyle Collings
Previous by Thread:  Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1, Doyle Collings
Next by Thread:  Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1, Doyle Collings
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]