Re: Changed behavior of amflush, going to background?
2008-04-17 18:59:13
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Zembower, Kevin <kzembowe AT jhuccp DOT org>
wrote:
> Wow, I would have never guessed that I wanted -f (run in foreground) AND
> -b (run in background) together. I assumed that they were mutually
> exclusive. Will try out later. I suggest that the documentation be
> changed to reflect this capacity. Thanks so much for suggesting this.
I'm not sure which documentation you're looking at, but I see "-b: Run
Amflush in batch mode". You want it to do a batch run in the
foreground, so -b -f makes perfect sense :)
That said, if you provide new/changed text, I'll be glad to add it!
Dustin
--
Storage Software Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
|
|
|