Re: tar dumps, performance
2007-08-13 19:32:14
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:21:17AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> I may be wrong, but I'd have thought that the TEE was in memory, then
> piped again to gzip and with the final output being put to an index
> directory specified in amanda.conf.
are the index directory and holding directory on the same device?
I was under the impression that everything (including the index) was
written to holding disk and moved into the indexdir _after_ the backup
dumped to tape.
running iostat on the holding disk while backups are running might help
rule out and disk bottleneck.
--
Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | agrier AT poofygoof DOT com
The United States is the one true country. The US is just. The US
is fair. The US respects its citizens. The US loves you. We have
always been at war against terrorism.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- tar dumps, performance, Brian Cuttler
- Re: tar dumps, performance, Dustin J. Mitchell
- Re: tar dumps, performance, Jon LaBadie
- Re: tar dumps, performance, Brian Cuttler
- Message not available
- Re: tar dumps, performance, Brian Cuttler
- Re: tar dumps, performance, Aaron J. Grier
- Re: tar dumps, performance, Brian Cuttler
- Re: tar dumps, performance,
Aaron J. Grier <=
- Re: tar dumps, performance, Dustin J. Mitchell
- Re: tar dumps, performance, Brian Cuttler
|
|
|