Re: which report do I believe?
2007-04-30 11:48:54
You should believe everything.
Steven Settlemyre wrote:
I am looking to restore a disk from one of my machines and am having a
little trouble understanding which report to believe. Using amadmin
find, I see there was a level 0 on 4/12 and again on 4/19.
When I look at the daily reports I see on 4/12:
pop:/files1.0 in-memory
taper: no split_diskbuffer specified: using fallback split size of
10240kb to buffer
and
HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-kB OUT-kB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s
MMM:SS KB/s
-------------------------- -------------------------------------------
-------------
pop /files1 0 17024192 9961504 58.5 178:38 926.5
178:39 929.4
Then on 4/19 i see:
NOTES:
planner: Incremental of pop:/files1 bumped to level 3.
If it was an increment it would be a level 3, but amanda choose to do a
full (level 0).
and
HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-kB OUT-kB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s
MMM:SS KB/s
-------------------------- -------------------------------------------
-------------
pop /files1 0 17089120 9965664 58.3 148:35 1117.9 30:39
5418.9
So is 4/19 a level 3 or level 0?
Also, in the amadmin find, I see that 4/12 has 973 parts, whereas 4/19
only has 2 parts.
4/12 has 973 parts of 10240kb
4/19 has 2 parts of a bigger size. What is your tape_splitsize?
4/12 goes directly to tape, without using the holding disk, it use part
of size fallback_splitsize,
4/19 go through the holding disk and use part of size tape_splitsize.
Why the big difference? What could cause such things? and what steps
should i take to restore this disk?
As usual, amrecover or amfetchdump.
Jean-Louis
|
|
|