Amanda-Users

2.5.1 tape spanning not actually working for me.

2006-10-01 16:18:51
Subject: 2.5.1 tape spanning not actually working for me.
From: Steve Newcomb <srn AT coolheads DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: 01 Oct 2006 16:09:42 -0400
I'm using chg-multi with two identical Exabyte drives.  The capacity
of each tape is slightly less than 5 Gb.  I have a DLE that, at level
0, creates a dump of 22 Gb.

I haven't found any way to flush the dump from the holding disk onto
tape.  I have specified for the dumptype:

     tape_splitsize 500 Mb 

and I have specified for the holdingdisk:

     chunksize 500 Mb 

So I run amflush.  Hours later, amflush reports:

*** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY!
The dumps were flushed to tapes CH0008, CH0009.
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [No more writable valid tape found].

Nothing has been deleted from the holding disk.  If I run
amflush again, hours later I get the same report again.

What am I doing wrong?  Or does tape spanning actually *not* work
unless the dump is smaller than the total capacity of the changer?
(If that's the case, it might be a good idea to say so on the tape
spanning page in the wiki.)

-- Steve

Steven R. Newcomb, Consultant
Coolheads Consulting

Co-editor, Topic Maps International Standard (ISO/IEC 13250)
Co-editor, draft Topic Maps -- Reference Model (ISO/IEC 13250-5)

srn AT coolheads DOT com
http://www.coolheads.com

direct: +1 540 951 9773
main:   +1 540 951 9774
fax:    +1 540 951 9775

208 Highview Drive
Blacksburg, Virginia 24060 USA


(Confidential to all US government personnel to whom this private
letter is not addressed and who are reading it in the absence of a
specific search warrant: You are violating the law and you are
co-conspiring to subvert the Constitution that you are sworn to
defend.  You can either refuse to commit this crime, or you can expect
to suffer criminal sanctions in the future, when the current
administration of the United States of America has been replaced by
one that respects the rule of law.  I do not envy you for having to
make this difficult choice, but I urge you to make it wisely.)



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>