Amanda-Users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

have runtar security holes?

2006-08-22 05:25:37
Subject: have runtar security holes?
From: Natalia García Nebot <natalia AT sisystem DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:17:09 +0200 
Hi all!
the wrapper runtar could make security holes? the amanda behavior using runtar (which have the bit suid activated) to backup the system is really safe? which security implications could have?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • have runtar security holes?, Natalia García Nebot <=
Previous by Date:  Re: RE Why tar with amanda?, Cyrille Bollu
Next by Date:  Re: Backup plan and big filesystems, Fabio Corazza
Previous by Thread:  Re: RE Why tar with amanda?, Cyrille Bollu
Next by Thread:  Running amcheck, all hosts on one subnet timeout, Peter Farrell
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]