Amanda-Users

Re: RE Tuning for performance

2006-08-21 12:19:03
Subject: Re: RE Tuning for performance
From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>
To: Cyrille Bollu <Cyrille.Bollu AT fedasil DOT be>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:10:56 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 at 5:28pm, Cyrille Bollu wrote

For the record my BOT system is made of:

   1) 1 Dell Poweredge 2850 with 1 1.4TB RAID5 array made of 6 U320 SCSI
HD

What RAID controller? Have you benchmarked the array itself with something like bonnie++ or tiobench?

   2) 1 Dell Powervault 110 LTO3 tape drive
   3) Redhat ES 3.3
   4) Amanda (amanda-2.4.4p1-0.3E)

Is your tape drive on its own controller?

5) Use the holding disk feature.

As you suspected, you don't want to do that in this case.

6) Recompile Amanda and raise the tape record size

You *do* want to do this. When I first got my LTO3 library, I did some performance tests with tar and varying blocksizes. I found that bigger generally was better. 'tar -b 64' (which equals amanda's default 32KiB blocksize) got me 41MiB/s, but 'tar -b 4096' got me 60MiB/s. So I now use a 2MiB blocksize.

7) increase the server's TCP/IP MTU?

This will have no effect. All traffic is local, so it'll be going over lo and not any eth device.

--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>