Amanda-Users

new 2.5.1b1-20060717?

2006-07-19 13:01:21
Subject: new 2.5.1b1-20060717?
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
To: amanda <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:53:34 -0400
Howdy all;

I'm back (and darned glad of it) from the UP/MI and trying to play 
catchup on my main box here, so I just built and installed 
2.5.1b1-20060717.  I've not seen this warning from an amcheck run 
before, should it be something I should be concerned with?

[root@coyote amanda-2.5.1b1-20060717]# su amanda -c "amcheck Daily"
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-----------------------------
Holding disk /dumps: 12071 MB disk space available, using 12360848 MB
slot 12: read label `Dailys-12', date `20060719'
cannot overwrite active tape Dailys-12
slot 13: read label `Dailys-13', date `20060425'
NOTE: skipping tape-writable test
Tape Dailys-13 label ok
Server check took 0.677 seconds

Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
--------------------------------
WARNING: gene:/var:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/usr/bin:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/usr/local:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/usr/src:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/etc:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/lib:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/sbin:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/opt:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/root:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/home:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/boot:"" host does not support quoted text
WARNING: gene:/bin:"" host does not support quoted text
Client check: 2 hosts checked in 0.510 seconds, 0 problems found

(brought to you by Amanda 2.5.1b1-20060717)

I might have been concerned if it was a samba share, but thats not how 
its accessing my firewall box, its actually running an older amanda 
client, also locally built.  It looks as if that client is from 
amanda-2.4.5-20051006, now a wee bit long in the tooth. :)

Is that a problem that I need to update?  Or has 2.5.1b1 not had enough 
Real Kill bug spray applied yet?

-- 
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules.  I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>