Re: A virtual tape question
2006-02-05 10:50:55
On Sunday 05 February 2006 10:17, stan wrote:
>I'm preparing to upgrade an existing Amanda installation.
>
>It's been a while since I looked at what Amanda can do, since the
> existing system "just works". I'm considering using virtual tapes, in
> some fashion on the new system.
>
>These leads me to a question (perhaps the first of several). Reading
>through http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/File_driver It recommends
> putting the virtual tape disk(s) on a different server than the
> holding disk(s). Am I reading this correctly?
I don't think so, Stan. But it is a very good idea to have the vtapes
on a seperate cable of the controller as that will speed things up
quite a bit by reducing cable contention issues. I have my vtapes
on /dev/hdd, with the holdingdisk area on /dev/hda. I also have a
small amount of /dev/hdd as swap, again for the same reason.
Ditto /var, for somewhat the same reason, and in case /dev/hda should go
read-only due to an error, I still have the log entries to tell me what
went toes up. And that can be worth its weight in sliced bread or
bottled beer under those conditions. :)
>If so, how would I access these disks? NFS seems like a slow way of
> doing this.
Excruciatingly, since nfs has never worked here. :(
--
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
|
|
|