Re: is excluding /usr/local/var/amanda a bad idea ?
2005-11-11 08:25:07
I exclude the amanda dir from the rest of the backup, set it up so that
the amanda dir is a DLE, always full, no record or index, starttime is
when I'm sure all the other backups are done. This can have amanda report
very long Run Time & Dump Time as it will include the time waiting for
0700 to come around after the rest of the dumps have finished. If needed,
I can pull it off the tape in the usual amanda DR way just using standard
UNIX/Linux tools. It will be the very last DLE recorded.
mrdds2 /usr/local/etc/amanda {
swcomp
program "GNUTAR"
record no
index no
dumpcycle 0
starttime 0700
}
-----------------------------------------------------
toby bluhm
philips medical systems, cleveland ohio
tobias.bluhm AT philips DOT com
440-483-5323
Guy Dallaire <clepeterd AT gmail DOT com>
Sent by:
owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
11/10/2005 03:33 PM
To
"Amanda (E-mail)" <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
cc
Subject
is excluding /usr/local/var/amanda a bad idea ?
Classification
I excluded /usr/local/var/amanda from my amanda server backup because
amanda was complaining a lot about strange backups (the indexes and db
were updated while amanda was running tar on them, or something like that)
I'm realizing that if I lose this directory for some reason (ex: destroy
the db or index directories by error) I will no longer be able to use
amrecover and get a list of the backups that are on a particular tape. Or
restores will be a lot more difficult, until I go through a complete
dumpcycle.
Say you lose the amanda indexes and db, is there some sort of way to
rebuild it from the tapes ? Or a way to know what files (and last modified
date) are on which tapes ?
Thanks
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
Re: is excluding /usr/local/var/amanda a bad idea ?,
Tobias Bluhm <=
|
|
|