DDS-3 tapetype ???
2005-06-17 01:12:19
Earlier this year, my HP DAT tape drive had problems, and I replaced it
with a Compaq/Sony SDT-9000. Mostly, I am still using the same DDS-3
tapes that I was using, and retired some and added some. My old records
show that I was getting nearly the full 12GB uncompressed tape length.
Since the tape drive change, I have wondered why I didn't seem to be
getting all the data on some tapes. Clearly, with Amanda, some days it
just doesn't want to send a full 12GB to tape; but, mostly, I have been
seeing <9GB going to tape, and balance sitting in holdingdisk.
Today, I did this:
# time sudo -u backup amtapetype -e 12g -f /dev/nst0 -o
Writing 32 Mbyte compresseable data: 37 sec
Writing 32 Mbyte uncompresseable data: 35 sec
Estimated time to write 2 * 12288 Mbyte: 26880 sec = 7 h 28 min
wrote 298832 32Kb blocks in 76 files in 10632 seconds (short write)
wrote 310628 32Kb blocks in 158 files in 10840 seconds (short write)
define tapetype unknown-tapetype {
comment "just produced by tapetype prog (hardware compression off)"
length 9522 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 908 kps
}
real 364m39.451s
user 0m2.724s
sys 0m28.719s
What is going on here?
How can I get a full 12GB tape length?
What do you think?
--
Best Regards,
mds
mds resource
877.596.8237
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- DDS-3 tapetype ???,
Michael D Schleif <=
|
|
|