Amanda-Users

Re: lev 0 FAILED [Estimate timeout from ******]

2004-12-03 08:14:16
Subject: Re: lev 0 FAILED [Estimate timeout from ******]
From: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
To: Nuno Dias <ndias AT lip DOT pt>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:04:03 +0100
Nuno Dias wrote:
I think is not a problem of firewall because, if i put only one
filesystem in disklist it work.

Not sure.  Is there a firewall involved?
If the connection tracking times out after 5 minutes, then
maybe 1 filesystem can reply within that timeframe, but more
filesystems exceed the time.
Is there a firewall involved?  What is the UDP-timer value?
Is it any better is client and server disable firewall rules
competely?
Can you see the reply packet leave the client, and
arrive at the server? (capture all network traffic for udp
port 10080 at client and server to verify.)

Is there any other message in the client-file /tmp/amanda/sendsize.DATETIME.debug?



ND

On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 18:21 +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote:

Hi,

Completly shure?
many modern linux distros (AFAIK at least suse and redhat) come up
with default firewall-installations blocking many things if you do
not explicitly disable these firewalls.
So there might be a firewall on the linux-box even if you didn't
configure it.

Christoph

Nuno Dias schrieb:

No, the two machines are in the same network, no firewall.

ND

On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 17:55 +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote:


Nuno Dias schrieb:


Hi,

I have a Digital Unix machine that give me some strange results when i
try to use amanda.
If i configure disklist with 2 or more disks of the Digital Unix
machine, "the amanda report" tell me this:

xxxxxxx    /xxxx lev 0 FAILED [Estimate timeout from xxxxxx]
xxxxxxx    /usr lev 0 FAILED [Estimate timeout from xxxxxx]
xxxxxxx    / lev 0 FAILED [Estimate timeout from xxxxxx]

The amandad.20041202142753000.debug file in Digital Machine have this
error:

amandad: time 200.266: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 200.266: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: time 210.267: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 210.267: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: time 220.267: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 220.267: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: time 230.267: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 230.267: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: time 240.267: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 240.267: waiting for ack: timeout, giving up!
amandad: time 240.267: pid 22594 finish time Thu Dec  2 14:31:54 2004

The strange thing is, if i configure only one disk in disklist, the
backup run ok, and no problem is report in "amanda report".
I increased the etimeout/ctimeout to a big number ... and did not work.

I have a Linux machine that is the master and the Digital Unix machine
is the client, the version of amanda is 2.4.4p4

Thank's for some help.

ND

Hi,
could this be a firewall-timeout on the linux-machine?
Christoph


--
Paul Bijnens, Xplanation                            Tel  +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM    Fax  +32 16 397.512
http://www.xplanation.com/          email:  Paul.Bijnens AT xplanation DOT com
***********************************************************************
* I think I've got the hang of it now:  exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, F6, *
* quit,  ZZ, :q, :q!,  M-Z, ^X^C,  logoff, logout, close, bye,  /bye, *
* stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt,  abort,  hangup, *
* PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e,  kill -1 $$,  shutdown, *
* kill -9 1,  Alt-F4,  Ctrl-Alt-Del,  AltGr-NumLock,  Stop-A,  ...    *
* ...  "Are you sure?"  ...   YES   ...   Phew ...   I'm out          *
***********************************************************************



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>