Amanda-Users

Re: amcheck not saying "expecting tapeno. or a new tape"

2004-11-05 17:03:30
Subject: Re: amcheck not saying "expecting tapeno. or a new tape"
From: Gavin Henry <ghenry AT suretecsystems DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:59:02 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> You think there is an order to the tapes, 2 follows 1 etc.  Amanda could
> care less what "new tape" it writes to next.  If you put in tape3 next,
> amanda's order will have 3 following 1 in the future.  If you labelstr
> allows it (tape.*) amanda will happily use tape-gavin next and tape-henry
> after that.
>
> There seems to be no problem (from what I see anyway).
>

I agree after re-reading above. It orders the tapes according to what order 
you put them in the first place, as long as they either match the regex 
labelstr or are blank.

Cheers.

- -- 
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry.
Managing Director.

T +44 (0) 1467 624141
M +44 (0) 7930 323266
F +44 (0) 1224 742001
E ghenry AT suretecsystems DOT com

Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).

http://www.suretecsystems.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBi/emeWseh9tzvqgRAiPuAKCSQEWtWteCU6c4X8/a3a9wstDMWACfTtx7
rO8lvf35mvg0WQHE8t3WE9M=
=qWGw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----