Re: amcheck not saying "expecting tapeno. or a new tape"
2004-11-05 17:03:30
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> You think there is an order to the tapes, 2 follows 1 etc. Amanda could
> care less what "new tape" it writes to next. If you put in tape3 next,
> amanda's order will have 3 following 1 in the future. If you labelstr
> allows it (tape.*) amanda will happily use tape-gavin next and tape-henry
> after that.
>
> There seems to be no problem (from what I see anyway).
>
I agree after re-reading above. It orders the tapes according to what order
you put them in the first place, as long as they either match the regex
labelstr or are blank.
Cheers.
- --
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.
Managing Director.
T +44 (0) 1467 624141
M +44 (0) 7930 323266
F +44 (0) 1224 742001
E ghenry AT suretecsystems DOT com
Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).
http://www.suretecsystems.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBi/emeWseh9tzvqgRAiPuAKCSQEWtWteCU6c4X8/a3a9wstDMWACfTtx7
rO8lvf35mvg0WQHE8t3WE9M=
=qWGw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|