Amanda-Users

Re: Amanda backup levels

2004-04-21 04:06:39
Subject: Re: Amanda backup levels
From: Nicolas Ecarnot <nicolas.ecarnot AT accim DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:03:24 +0200
Jeroen Heijungs wrote:

Probably very stupid questions, but can someone shed some light on very simple 
questions: what exactly are
the differences between the different levels of backup? I searched the 
documentation and arcives but so far
I have not found the exact definitions.


Level n backup is a backup where you save what has changed since the last level n backup. period.

As I understand:
- level 0 is full-backup
- level 1 is incremental backup, based on modification time (?)
- what are the higher levels ???

You can do L0 backups once a month, L1 backups once a week, and L2 backups everyday. So, everyday, you will save what you changed since the last L2 backup, that is to say since the day before.

I explain that though now I hate incremental backups and pray for not having to do with them anymore. They may look fun (and indeed they DO are very well managed by Amanda) but it may turn to nightmare when you have to restore some directories with changes in different level backups, and one of you tape fails...

I ask now, because untill now we "only" had to backup FreeBSD servers acting as 
routers, gateways.
firewalls, mailrelayservers etc. None of them had real fast-changing user-data, 
so up-to-date restores were
not an high-priority issue and we never had to restore something (rock-solid 
os!).
But now we are moving to imap-mail and that means that there are lots of 
user-data which change very often
and have to restore more often (users delete mail-folders accidently), so I 
have to be sure that all changed
data is backed-up every run, users do not want mails missing.

In my company, we use OpenBSD as an imap server, and FreeBSD as a samba server, and the files are changing very fast. So we do L0 backups everynight.
If you can afford, avoid incremental backups.

Last question:
- are there gui-frontends for the restore, that work for the helpdesk staff 
(they cannont work with the
amrestore interface) ?

No. I heard they were people working on a web frontend, but hey, when you restore some data, are you sure you will have a gui running ? Are you even sure you will have any network working ? The command line interface is simple enough to be usable in the worst situation, think about that.

PS. CALLING ALL CARS : Are the guys working on the web frontend reading this e-mail ?

--
Nicolas Ecarnot


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>