Brian Cuttler wrote:
USAGE BY TAPE:
Label Time Size % Nb
NTNWKLY26 2:56 199870.1 199.9 29
You seem to have a tapecapacity of 100 Gbyte, so amanda scheduled up
to 200 Gbyte (for 2 runtapes). To do this it needed to do some
level 1 instead of full dumps.
But actually your tapes *are* bigger, and amanda put all the 200 GByte
on one tape only in reality. But that was after the schedule was decided.
Are these 200 Gbyte native tapes? Change your tape definition to 200 Gbyte.
If you use hardware compression, you may put a (safe) guess what will
fit on a tape, e.g. 200 Gbyte.
--
Paul Bijnens, Xplanation Tel +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM Fax +32 16 397.512
http://www.xplanation.com/ email: Paul.Bijnens AT xplanation DOT com
***********************************************************************
* I think I've got the hang of it now: exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, F6, *
* quit, ZZ, :q, :q!, M-Z, ^X^C, logoff, logout, close, bye, /bye, *
* stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt, abort, hangup, *
* PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e, kill -1 $$, shutdown, *
* kill -9 1, Alt-F4, Ctrl-Alt-Del, AltGr-NumLock, Stop-A, ... *
* ... "Are you sure?" ... YES ... Phew ... I'm out *
***********************************************************************
|