On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:14:12AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 12:10:17AM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
> > top - 23:19:51 up 5 days, 12:08, 23 users, load average: 0.00, 0.08, 0.17
> > Tasks: 141 total, 1 running, 137 sleeping, 0 stopped, 3 zombie
> > Cpu(s): 1.9% user, 2.2% system, 0.0% nice, 95.9% idle
> > Mem: 514224k total, 475768k used, 38456k free, 50224k buffers
> > Swap: 0k total, 0k used, 0k free, 182920k cached
^^
Argh!
Me little idiot forgot to mkswap on the swap partition the last time I
changed my disk configuration. Therefore the swapon command failed to add
swap space to the system (which I clearly should have noticed earlier).
As soon as I added swap space, the system is pretty responsive again and even
throughput for the copy operation went up to 19MB/s.
> My eye focused on something else. On an "idle" system you had 38MB free
> of 512MB total. During copying that dropped to just 4MB free. My Solaris
> system also has 512MB total, but 120MB free when "idle". Doing a copy
> such as you report only dropped it by about 25MB. I saw little degradation
> in interactive performance. This may be the case where the old saw "add
> more memory" may be a valid recommendation.
Sometimes even adding virtual memory helps :)
Thanks a lot and sorry for the confusion!
--
-- Josef Wolf -- jw AT raven.inka DOT de --
|