|
Re: Another amcheck question
2003-11-19 11:32:55
That would have been my guess too. However, the two machines are a
production email server and a dns server that have been up and running
for months. The fact that the client gets the connection and the
initial request would mean that they have some capacity to talk. I can
also nmap all of the services on the other side from both the server
and the client, so all of the ports that should be open are, and I can
connect to them from the other machine. I'm stumped, unless someone
has some new advice, I guess I'll move on.
Thanks,
Greg
Dana Bourgeois wrote:
Message
Offhand I think networking. ping the other from each,
both client and server. Check that all interfaces are up with proper
netmasks, addresses, default routes and gateways. The usual suspect
when there is no firewalling or router ACLs, VPN or NAT between client
and server is permissions but that's not what I saw in the logs. Its
like they can't even see each other. If you can ping from client to
server and server to client I will be mystified but I suspect you will
find you can't.
Dana Bourgeois
The server side gets a timeout. They are on the same IP subnet, so I
don't think a firewall would come into play here. Both boxes are
redhat 9 boxes with no system firewalling. If there's any other
information that would help, let me know.
thanks,
Greg
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Tuesday, November 18, 2003 15:35:11 -0800 Greg Harper <greg.harper AT kimptongroup DOT com> wrote:
Greetings,
I'm sure that people on the list are tired of amcheck questions, but
I've searched everywhere I could think of and haven't been able to
find a similar problem. I don't get anything useful from the server
side,
What are you getting on the server side, a timeout?
but here's what I get from the client amandad logs:
amandad: time 0.000: got packet:
--------
Amanda 2.4 REQ HANDLE 001-A85C0608 SEQ 1069180898
SECURITY USER amanda
SERVICE noop
OPTIONS features=fffffeff9ffe0f;
--------
amandad: time 0.000: sending ack:
----
Amanda 2.4 ACK HANDLE 001-A85C0608 SEQ 1069180898
----
amandad: time 0.000: bsd security: remote host mail.xxx.com user
amanda local user amanda
amandad: time 0.014: amandahosts security check passed
amandad: time 0.014: running service "noop"
amandad: time 0.014: sending REP packet:
----
Amanda 2.4 REP HANDLE 001-A85C0608 SEQ 1069180898
OPTIONS features=fffffeff9ffe0f;
----
amandad: time 9.514: got packet:
----
Amanda 2.4 REQ HANDLE 001-A85C0608 SEQ 1069180898
SECURITY USER amanda
SERVICE noop
OPTIONS features=fffffeff9ffe0f;
----
amandad: time 9.514: it is not an ack
amandad: time 9.514: sending REP packet:
----
Amanda 2.4 REP HANDLE 001-A85C0608 SEQ 1069180898
OPTIONS features=fffffeff9ffe0f;
----
amandad: time 19.511: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 19.511: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: time 19.515: got packet:
----
Amanda 2.4 REQ HANDLE 001-A85C0608 SEQ 1069180898
SECURITY USER amanda
SERVICE noop
OPTIONS features=fffffeff9ffe0f;
----
amandad: time 19.515: it is not an ack
amandad: time 29.511: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 29.511: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: time 39.510: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 39.510: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: time 49.510: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 49.510: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
amandad: time 59.509: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
amandad: time 59.510: waiting for ack: timeout, giving up!
amandad: time 59.510: pid 3434 finish time Tue Nov 18 10:42:49 2003
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Any chance there's a firewall in betwen (or tcpwrappers or
something similar on one or both boxes)?
Frank
Thanks,
Greg
|
|
|
|
