Re: Amanda overwrites level 0 dumps?
2003-10-26 15:08:00
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 05:42:53PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> What I expect of Amanda:
>
> * NEVER overwrite a level 0 dump, not even with another level 0.
I.e. NEVER use a tape a second time?
> This means: if I have 6 tapes, Amanda will have to write level 0 every
> FIFTH dump (not every SIXTH) at the latest. Of course, the "planner"
> (scheduler) can promote to level 0 earlier if that's necessary for
> capacity reasons.
It will if YOU configure it correctly.
> One thing I've never understood is: WHY does Amanda need to know the
> dumpcycle in days? If this feature has precedence over the tapecycle, it
> is broken.
I love it when someone, new to a package, can't get it to work even when
hundreds of others are using it, says "it is broken".
jl
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|
|
|