Bradley Glonka wrote:
Hi --
I'm trying to get a good tapetype definition
Below is what I get. Can it be possible to have a filemark
At 0 kbytes?
Yes, it could be very well. Some tapes use a small gap between
two files to mark the boundary between them. It could just
as well be implemented with some out-of-bound data that does
not take any space.
Amtapetype tries to measure it, but could not detect a significant
difference.
This is a LTO Utrium 1 tape drive with "intelligent compression"
I can't seem to turn compression off
[amanda@kiwi amanda]$ /usr/local/amanda/sbin/amtapetype -e 100g -f
/dev/nst0
Writing 1024 Mbyte compresseable data: 27 sec
Writing 1024 Mbyte uncompresseable data: 71 sec
WARNING: Tape drive has hardware compression enabled
Estimated time to write 2 * 102400 Mbyte: 14200 sec = 3 h 56 min
> wrote 3244032 32Kb blocks in 99 files in 7444 seconds (short write)
> wrote 3244032 32Kb blocks in 198 files in 7757 seconds (short write)
>
> define tapetype unknown-tapetype {
comment "just produced by tapetype prog (hardware compression on)"
length 101376 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 13663 kps
}
Seems very reasonable to what should be expected.
--
Paul
|